Jonathan B. Po
Impact in
-
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
-
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
- Surgery 5
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques 3
- Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy 2
- Co-authors
- Thomas P. Clements (1 shared paper)Sulieman Bani‐Ahmad (2 shared papers)James V. Maloney (2 shared papers)Ali Cakmak (2 shared papers)Gültekin Özsoyoğlu (2 shared papers)Gerald D. Buckberg (2 shared papers)Gordon N. Olinger (2 shared papers)Donald G. Mulder (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- FEBS Journal (1 paper)The VLDB Journal (1 paper)The Journal of Urology (1 paper)Annals of Surgery (1 paper)Radiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jonathan B. Po
10 papers receiving 235 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Infectious Diseases 82
- Modeling and Simulation 14
- General Dentistry 3
- Neurology 19
- Biological Psychiatry 3
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan B. Po
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan B. Po's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan B. Po with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan B. Po more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan B. Po
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan B. Po. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan B. Po. The network helps show where Jonathan B. Po may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan B. Po, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 199 | |
| 2 | 1975 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1975 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1974 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 8 | Myocardial revascularization in high-risk coronary patients. | 1976 | 2 |
| 9 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 1 |
About Jonathan B. Po
Jonathan B. Po is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 10 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (82 citations), Modeling and Simulation (14 citations), General Dentistry (3 citations), Neurology (19 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (3 citations). Jonathan B. Po has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas P. Clements, Sulieman Bani‐Ahmad, James V. Maloney, Ali Cakmak, Gültekin Özsoyoğlu, Gerald D. Buckberg, Gordon N. Olinger, Donald G. Mulder, R Arndt and Patrick J. Cahill. Their work appears in journals such as FEBS Journal, The VLDB Journal, The Journal of Urology, Annals of Surgery and Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.