Jonas Tesarz

3.3k citations
89 papers · 2.0k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Jonas Tesarz

76 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Jonas Tesarz
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Pharmacology 560
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 387
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 41
  • Gastroenterology 72
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 65
Replace Wolfgang Eich with:
Wolfgang Eich Germany
Yannick Tousignant‐Laflamme Canada
Bridgett Rahim-Williams United States
Christopher Sivert Nielsen Norway
Emily A. Wise United States
Anneleen Malfliet Belgium
Phillip J. Quartana United States
John G. Arena United States
Iris Coppieters Belgium
Richard T. Gross United States
Jonas Tesarz relative to Wolfgang Eich Germany Wolfgang Eich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Wolfgang Eich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Tesarz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Tesarz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Tesarz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Tesarz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Tesarz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Tesarz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Tesarz. The network helps show where Jonas Tesarz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonas Tesarz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonas Tesarz Line = papers co-authored together Jonas Tesarz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012229
2 2011184
3 2011135
4 2018132
5 201686
6 201680
7 201380
8 201569
9 201368
10 201567
11 201367
12 202257
13 201946
14 201543
15 201342
16 201637
17 202330
18 202029
19 201926
20 201925

About Jonas Tesarz

Jonas Tesarz is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (29 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (15 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (14 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (10 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (9 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (9 papers) and Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (560 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (387 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (41 citations), Gastroenterology (72 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (65 citations). Jonas Tesarz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Eich, Andreas Gerhardt, Rolf‐Detlef Treede, Alexander K. Schuster, Mechthild Hartmann, Christiane Bieber, Siegfried Mense, Ulrich Hoheisel, Bernd Wiedenhöfer and Markus Wettstein. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Pain Medicine and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact