Jonah Shaver

2.0k citations
33 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Jonah Shaver

33 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jonah Shaver
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Materials Chemistry 1.1k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 659
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 198
  • Biomedical Engineering 460
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 24
Replace Dong Qin with:
Dong Qin United States
Jui‐Hung Hsu Taiwan
Jan W. Gerritsen Netherlands
L. J. Geerligs Netherlands
Josep Canet‐Ferrer Spain
Kai Braun Germany
Kokou D. Dorkenoo France
Atsushi Yokoo Japan
Stijn Van Cleuvenbergen Belgium
Jonah Shaver relative to Dong Qin United States Dong Qin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Dong Qin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonah Shaver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonah Shaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonah Shaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonah Shaver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonah Shaver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonah Shaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonah Shaver. The network helps show where Jonah Shaver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonah Shaver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonah Shaver Line = papers co-authored together Jonah Shaver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004236
2 2011105
3 200594
4 201690
5 201489
6 200685
7 200479
8 200774
9 200773
10 201370
11 200663
12 201260
13 200657
14 200848
15 201446
16 201237
17 201436
18 201533
19 201430
20 200427

About Jonah Shaver

Jonah Shaver is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (21 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (15 papers), Graphene research and applications (9 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (5 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (5 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (4 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (659 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (198 citations), Biomedical Engineering (460 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations). Jonah Shaver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. Hauge, R. E. Smalley, Junichiro Kono, Valerie C. Moore, G. N. Ostojic, S. Zaric, Sang‐Hyun Oh, X. Wei, Michael S. Strano and O. Portugall. Their work appears in journals such as Nano Letters, ACS Photonics, ACS Nano, Physical Review B and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact