Jon K. Piper
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forestry top 5%
Papers in
-
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 10
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 4
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 11
- Seedling growth and survival studies 5
- Co-authors
- Wes Jackson (1 shared paper)Peter Kulakow (2 shared papers)Stuart L. Pimm (1 shared paper)Dwight Krehbiel (3 shared papers)Richard P. Zerger (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (2 papers)American Journal of Botany (2 papers)Community Ecology (2 papers)Oikos (1 paper)Field Crops Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jon K. Piper
26 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 173
- Forestry 41
- Agronomy and Crop Science 96
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 133
- Soil Science 46
Countries citing papers authored by Jon K. Piper
This map shows the geographic impact of Jon K. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon K. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon K. Piper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jon K. Piper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon K. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon K. Piper. The network helps show where Jon K. Piper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jon K. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 58 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 51 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 39 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 34 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 17 | A Remote-Access LabVIEW-based Laboratory for Environmental and Ecological Science* | 2003 | 7 |
| 18 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 19 | A Grain Agriculture Fashioned in Nature’s Image: The Work of the Land Institute | 1993 | 5 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3 |
About Jon K. Piper
Jon K. Piper is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (10 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (7 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (5 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers) and Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (173 citations), Forestry (41 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (96 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (133 citations) and Soil Science (46 citations). Jon K. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Wes Jackson, Peter Kulakow, Stuart L. Pimm, Dwight Krehbiel and Richard P. Zerger. Their work appears in journals such as Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, American Journal of Botany, Community Ecology, Oikos and Field Crops Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.