Jon Cole
Impact in
- Oceanography top 5%
- Marine and coastal ecosystems
- Marine Biology and Ecology Research
- Environmental Chemistry top 5%
- Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Marine and coastal ecosystems 6
- Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses 2
- Ecology 4
- Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity 2
- Isotope Analysis in Ecology 1
- Co-authors
- Peter A. Stæhr (1 shared paper)W. Michael Kemp (1 shared paper)Jeremy M. Testa (1 shared paper)Yves T. Prairie (2 shared papers)Stephen V. Smith (1 shared paper)Kaj Sand‐Jensen (1 shared paper)Marten Scheffer (1 shared paper)Leonel da Silveira Lobo Sternberg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (2 papers)Aquatic Sciences (1 paper)Global Biogeochemical Cycles (1 paper)BioScience (1 paper)Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsMexico
In The Last Decade
Jon Cole
8 papers receiving 436 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Oceanography 289
- Environmental Chemistry 197
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 94
- Ecology 166
- Global and Planetary Change 121
Countries citing papers authored by Jon Cole
This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Cole more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Cole
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Cole. The network helps show where Jon Cole may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 164 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 8 | Linkages between aquatic sediment biota and life above sediments as potential drivers of biodiversity | 2000 | 1 |
| 9 | 2013 | 0 |
About Jon Cole
Jon Cole is a scholar working on Oceanography, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and coastal ecosystems (6 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (3 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (3 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity (2 papers), Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses (2 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper) and Marine and fisheries research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oceanography (289 citations), Environmental Chemistry (197 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (94 citations), Ecology (166 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (121 citations). Jon Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Peter A. Stæhr, W. Michael Kemp, Jeremy M. Testa, Yves T. Prairie, Stephen V. Smith, Kaj Sand‐Jensen, Marten Scheffer, Leonel da Silveira Lobo Sternberg, Fábio Roland and Néstor Mazzeo. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Aquatic Sciences, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, BioScience and Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.