John Young

1.6k citations
42 papers · 635 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

John Young

37 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

John Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Development 40
  • Political Science and International Relations 249
  • Insect Science 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 251
  • Anthropology 45
Replace Sarah Vaughan with:
Sarah Vaughan United Kingdom
W. B. Morgan
John S. McCormick United States
Gwyn Campbell Canada
Frans Viljoen South Africa
Douglas R. Weiner United States
Michael O’Flaherty United Kingdom
Michael Hubbard United States
Hans G. Schabel United States
Robert Wasserstrom United States
John Young relative to Sarah Vaughan United Kingdom Sarah Vaughan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Sarah Vaughan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Young. The network helps show where John Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Young Line = papers co-authored together John Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199788
2 197964
3 200352
4 199642
5 199637
6 199837
7
The Fate of Sudan the Origins and Consequences of a Flawed Peace Process
201233
8 199728
9 201624
10 200323
11 200422
12 200521
13 198218
14 200217
15 200514
16 199113
17 199713
18 20019
19 19999
20 19988

About John Young

John Young is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology and History, having authored 42 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture analysis (9 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (6 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers), Global Political and Social Dynamics (4 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (3 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (40 citations), Political Science and International Relations (249 citations), Insect Science (79 citations), Sociology and Political Science (251 citations) and Anthropology (45 citations). John Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ethiopia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard B. Chalfant, Olli Vainio, Marko Luhtala, Clive A. Tregaskes, L.W. Barnthouse, Eric T. Schultz, Kamazima M. M. Lwiza, Peter R. Thomison, Donald Crummey and Bert L. Bishop. Their work appears in journals such as Review of African Political Economy, Journal of Economic Entomology, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, The Journal of Modern African Studies and Biochemical Society Transactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact