John Wei

1.2k citations
35 papers · 876 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John Wei

33 papers receiving 824 citations

Peers

John Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Urology 69
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 291
  • Oncology 175
  • General Health Professions 138
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 40
Replace Vinay Prabhu with:
Vinay Prabhu United States
Peter Heathcote Australia
Adam J. Gadzinski United States
Michael Kearney United States
Gregory J. Nason Ireland
Lise Mørkved Helsingen Norway
Samuel L. Washington United States
Leah Zajdlewicz Australia
Iman K. Martin United States
Philip H. Smith United Kingdom
John Wei relative to Vinay Prabhu United States Vinay Prabhu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Vinay Prabhu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Wei. The network helps show where John Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Wei Line = papers co-authored together John Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000188
2 1999145
3 200596
4 200394
5 200488
6 201239
7 200036
8 201329
9 201823
10 201322
11
Queer Chinese Cultures and Mobilities: Kinship, Migration, and Middle Classes
202021
12 201418
13 20029
14 20079
15 20218
16 20166
17 20015
18 20135
19 20254
20 20233

About John Wei

John Wei is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Social Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 876 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Culture and Media Studies (9 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers) and Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (69 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (291 citations), Oncology (175 citations), General Health Professions (138 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (40 citations). John Wei has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rodney L. Dunn, James E. Montie, Martin Šanda, Robert Marcovich, Angela Fagerlin, Margaret Holmes‐Rovner, Sue Stableford, David R. Rovner, Gary J. Faerber and Craig A. Jaffe. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Urology, Journal of Homosexuality, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making and Cancer Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact