John Walsh
Impact in
- History top 5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Historical Architecture and Urbanism
- Religious studies top 10%
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 6
- History 6
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 2
- Mormonism, Religion, and History 2
- Catholicism and Religious Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Mark Caleb Smith (1 shared paper)Craig S. Rose (1 shared paper)Jeremy Gregory (1 shared paper)G. M. Ditchfield (1 shared paper)Mark Goldie (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Elbourne (1 shared paper)Arthur Burns (1 shared paper)W. R. Ward (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Science (2 papers)Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (1 paper)The English Historical Review (1 paper)The Journal of Ecclesiastical History (1 paper)Studies in Church History (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John Walsh
8 papers receiving 28 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- History 39
- Religious studies 12
- Museology 6
- Architecture 2
- Political Science and International Relations 29
Countries citing papers authored by John Walsh
This map shows the geographic impact of John Walsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Walsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Walsh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Walsh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Walsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Walsh. The network helps show where John Walsh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside John Walsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 34 | |
| 2 | 1972 | 7 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1975 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1959 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 9 | This is Catholicism | 1959 | 0 |
| 10 | 2005 | 0 |
About John Walsh
John Walsh is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Religious studies, History and Philosophy of Science and Anthropology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 58 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper), Moravian Church and William Blake (1 paper), Catholicism and Religious Studies (1 paper) and Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (39 citations), Religious studies (12 citations), Museology (6 citations), Architecture (2 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (29 citations). John Walsh has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Caleb Smith, Craig S. Rose, Jeremy Gregory, G. M. Ditchfield, Mark Goldie, Elizabeth Elbourne, Arthur Burns, W. R. Ward, Jeffrey S. Chamberlain and Peter Nockles. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, The English Historical Review, The Journal of Ecclesiastical History and Studies in Church History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.