John Turek

3.4k citations
120 papers · 2.4k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

    • Optical Coherence Tomography Applications 28
    • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 17
    • Cell Image Analysis Techniques 7

John Turek

112 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

John Turek
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Biophysics 242
  • Equine 53
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 322
  • Small Animals 138
  • Biochemistry 128
Replace Mark D. Gorrell with:
Mark D. Gorrell Australia
Peter Jackson United Kingdom
John J. Callanan Ireland
Jean D. Sipe United States
Hugo Murua Escobar Germany
Norio Katoh Japan
J B Allen United States
Paul Garside United Kingdom
P Grabar France
Nancy D. Kock United States
John Turek relative to Mark D. Gorrell Australia Mark D. Gorrell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Mark D. Gorrell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Turek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Turek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Turek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Turek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Turek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Turek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Turek. The network helps show where John Turek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Turek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Turek Line = papers co-authored together John Turek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993179
2 2014151
3
Indium-111-DTPA-folate as a potential folate-receptor-targeted radiopharmaceutical.
1998115
4 199898
5 200095
6 200071
7 198763
8 199962
9 199654
10 200349
11 200747
12 199946
13 199245
14 198743
15 199442
16 200441
17 199641
18 200340
19 199139
20 200438

About John Turek

John Turek is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Biophysics, Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Cell Biology, having authored 120 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (28 papers), Digital Holography and Microscopy (18 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (17 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (13 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (7 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (7 papers), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (6 papers) and Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (242 citations), Equine (53 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (322 citations), Small Animals (138 citations) and Biochemistry (128 citations). John Turek has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip S. Low, David D. Nolte, Ingrid A. Schoenlein, Bruce A. Watkins, Kwan Jeong, G. D. Bottoms, Daniela Matei, Stephen F. Badylak, Rodolphe Meyer and Kurt D. Hankenson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Veterinary Pathology, Scientific Reports, Applied Optics and Journal of Biomedical Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact