John T. Emlen

2.9k citations
46 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

John T. Emlen

42 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John T. Emlen
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Developmental Biology 172
  • Ecological Modeling 246
  • Ecology 1.3k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 582
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 505
Replace A.C. Perdeck with:
A.C. Perdeck Netherlands
Andreas J. Helbig Germany
Johan Bäckman Sweden
Guðmundur A. Guðmundsson Iceland
Gary D. Schnell United States
Göran Högstedt Norway
William H. Drury United States
Hugh Ford Australia
Cecilia Kullberg Sweden
Silvano Benvenuti Italy
John T. Emlen relative to A.C. Perdeck Netherlands A.C. Perdeck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
A.C. Perdeck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John T. Emlen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Emlen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Emlen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Emlen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Emlen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Emlen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Emlen. The network helps show where John T. Emlen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John T. Emlen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John T. Emlen Line = papers co-authored together John T. Emlen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971369
2 1974299
3 1966287
4 1977115
5 196256
6 197450
7 196549
8 197749
9 198642
10 195242
11 197037
12 196635
13 195334
14 197234
15 198632
16 195730
17 195628
18 196328
19 196725
20 196923

About John T. Emlen

John T. Emlen is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Plant Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (16 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (4 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers) and Bird parasitology and diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (172 citations), Ecological Modeling (246 citations), Ecology (1.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (582 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (505 citations). John T. Emlen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen T. Emlen, D. E. Miller, George B. Schaller, Helmut C. Mueller, John Neess, David H. Thompson, Roger M. Evans, Timothy C. Moermond, Ludlow Griscom and David E. Davis. Their work appears in journals such as The Auk, Ecology, Journal of Wildlife Management, Behaviour and Ornithological Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact