John Strain

1.9k citations
35 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

John Strain

33 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

John Strain
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 279
  • Computational Mechanics 788
  • Numerical Analysis 107
  • Computational Mathematics 7
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 247
Replace Karen Devine with:
Karen Devine United States
Alan Cline United States
Folkmar Bornemann Germany
Serge Dubuc Canada
E. D’Azevedo United States
Anil N. Hirani United States
Chohong Min South Korea
Jonathan Joseph Hu United States
J. W. Bruce United Kingdom
Chen Greif Canada
John Strain relative to Karen Devine United States Karen Devine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Karen Devine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Strain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Strain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Strain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Strain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Strain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Strain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Strain. The network helps show where John Strain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside John Strain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Strain Line = papers co-authored together John Strain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991375
2 1999131
3 1999113
4 2006109
5 199092
6 199982
7 199556
8 200052
9 199147
10 198945
11 200843
12 199236
13 199433
14 199429
15 200128
16 201127
17 200427
18 200718
19 201118
20 198816

About John Strain

John Strain is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Aerospace Engineering and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (11 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (7 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (6 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (6 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (5 papers), Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (5 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (5 papers) and Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (279 citations), Computational Mechanics (788 citations), Numerical Analysis (107 citations), Computational Mathematics (7 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (247 citations). John Strain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Leslie Greengard, Adam W. Bargteil, Tolga G. Goktekin, James F. O’Brien, Tianbing Chen, Sanjay Govindjee, Giovanni Russo, J. Thomas Beale, Anders C. Hansen and David W. McLaughlin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Physics, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Mathematics of Computation and SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact