Chen Greif

57 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Chen Greif
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Computational Mathematics 44
  • Numerical Analysis 328
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 169
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 645
  • Computational Mechanics 791
Replace J. A. Scott with:
J. A. Scott United Kingdom
Tzanio Kolev United States
G. A. Watson United Kingdom
Haim Avron Israel
Guergana Petrova United States
John Strain United States
Afonso S. Bandeira United States
Shivkumar Chandrasekaran United States
James McKee United Kingdom
Marco Donatelli Italy
Chen Greif relative to J. A. Scott United Kingdom J. A. Scott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
J. A. Scott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chen Greif

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chen Greif's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen Greif with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen Greif more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chen Greif

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen Greif. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen Greif. The network helps show where Chen Greif may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen Greif, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chen Greif Line = papers co-authored together Chen Greif links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010166
2 2010123
3 2003119
4 200690
5 200778
6 201177
7 201067
8 201161
9 200860
10 201559
11
Preconditioners for saddle point linear systems with highly singular blocks.
200651
12 201440
13 200739
14 200635
15 201233
16 201532
17 201228
18 200525
19 199822
20 199919

About Chen Greif

Chen Greif is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computational Mechanics, Numerical Analysis, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (38 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (23 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (19 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (11 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (9 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (5 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (5 papers) and Tensor decomposition and applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (44 citations), Numerical Analysis (328 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (169 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (645 citations) and Computational Mechanics (791 citations). Chen Greif has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Gene H. Golub, Dominik Schötzau, Uri M. Ascher, Daniel Cohen‐Or, J. M. Varah, Andrei Sharf, Robert Bridson, Haim Avron, David F. Gleich and Dan Li. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, ACM Transactions on Graphics and Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact