John Stephen
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
-
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Papers in
- Surgery 11
- Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects 9
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 5
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 5
-
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 4
- Co-authors
- R. G. Hicks (11 shared papers)David Burke (9 shared papers)Ian J. Woodforth (9 shared papers)Matthew Crawford (6 shared papers)David Burke (2 shared papers)Matthew R. Crawford (2 shared papers)Martin Sullivan (1 shared paper)John Magnussen (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Anesthesia & Analgesia (4 papers)The Medical Journal of Australia (2 papers)Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (2 papers)The Journal of Physiology (1 paper)Spine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
John Stephen
16 papers receiving 578 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Neurology 133
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 64
- Surgery 385
- Developmental Neuroscience 26
- Cognitive Neuroscience 72
Countries citing papers authored by John Stephen
This map shows the geographic impact of John Stephen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stephen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stephen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Stephen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stephen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stephen. The network helps show where John Stephen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside John Stephen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 127 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 93 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 75 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 74 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 47 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 43 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 39 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 33 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 32 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1977 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1 |
About John Stephen
John Stephen is a scholar working on Surgery, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects (9 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (5 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (4 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (133 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (64 citations), Surgery (385 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (26 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (72 citations). John Stephen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include R. G. Hicks, David Burke, Ian J. Woodforth, Matthew Crawford, David Burke, Matthew R. Crawford, Martin Sullivan, John Magnussen, John Pereira and Hans Van der Wall. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, The Medical Journal of Australia, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, The Journal of Physiology and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.