John Stapleton

675 citations
16 papers · 583 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John Stapleton

15 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers

John Stapleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Applied Psychology 49
  • Condensed Matter Physics 113
  • Epidemiology 245
  • Clinical Psychology 120
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 74
Replace Juan Antonio Amador with:
Juan Antonio Amador Spain
Elizabeth Bauer United States
Rebecca Graves United States
T. Hirai Japan
Stephanie Brown United States
L Richard France
Richard W. Handel United States
Dale E. Alexander United States
Xue Du China
Chanhee Kim South Korea
John Stapleton relative to Juan Antonio Amador Spain Juan Antonio Amador's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Juan Antonio Amador · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Stapleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stapleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Stapleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stapleton. The network helps show where John Stapleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Stapleton Line = papers co-authored together John Stapleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1983112
2 198488
3 198371
4 200358
5 198650
6 198449
7 200449
8 199632
9 200424
10 198615
11 200511
12 200410
13
Effects of alcohol and other psychotropic drugs on eye movements: Relevance to traffic safety
19875
14 19875
15 20043
16 19611

About John Stapleton

John Stapleton is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ZnO doping and properties (6 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (5 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (4 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (49 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (113 citations), Epidemiology (245 citations), Clinical Psychology (120 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (74 citations). John Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gloria K. Litman, A. N. Oppenheim, Paul R. Jackson, Markku Linnoila, G. T. Thaler, R. M. Frazier, S. J. Pearton, Howard D. Chilcoat, C. R. Abernathy and Carlo U. Segre. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Electronic Materials and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact