John Sheffield

140 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

John Sheffield
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 278
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 783
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 323
  • Catalysis 135
  • Aerospace Engineering 387
Replace G.L. Kulcinski with:
G.L. Kulcinski United States
L. Bromberg United States
Huan Guo China
T. B. Reed United States
David L. Jacobson United States
Paul S. Lee South Korea
Klaus H. Kiefer Germany
Luca Chiari Australia
Mark A. Prelas United States
Hans Dieter Baehr Germany
John Sheffield relative to G.L. Kulcinski United States G.L. Kulcinski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.3×
G.L. Kulcinski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Sheffield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Sheffield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Sheffield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Sheffield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Sheffield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Sheffield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Sheffield. The network helps show where John Sheffield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Sheffield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Sheffield Line = papers co-authored together John Sheffield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 150 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986119
2 1965111
3 2012107
4 198670
5 199467
6 198967
7 201465
8 199364
9 200762
10 202157
11 196557
12 196548
13 201145
14 197842
15 201441
16 202237
17 199836
18 197534
19 197233
20 201333

About John Sheffield

John Sheffield is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering, Energy Engineering and Power Technology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 150 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (46 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (21 papers), Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (21 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (15 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (12 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (11 papers), Hydrogen Storage and Materials (11 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Energy Engineering and Power Technology (278 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (783 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (323 citations), Catalysis (135 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (387 citations). John Sheffield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Т. Н. Везироглу, Kevin Martin, J. W. M. Paul, Mathew Thomas, D. H. Froula, S. H. Glenzer, Neville C. Luhmann, S. A. Sherif, J. Hugill and Donn Byrne. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Journal of Fusion Energy, Nuclear Fusion, Fusion Science & Technology and Case Studies in Thermal Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact