John Schmalzbauer
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Communication top 10%
- Media Studies and Communication
- Social Media and Politics
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Papers in
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 10
- Religion, Society, and Development 6
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 2
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 8
- Co-authors
- Mark Pedelty (1 shared paper)Maureen R. Waller (1 shared paper)Michèle Lamont (1 shared paper)Daniel Weber (1 shared paper)Elaine Howard Ecklund (1 shared paper)David Sikkink (1 shared paper)Michael O. Emerson (1 shared paper)Sally K. Gallagher (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sociology of Religion (4 papers)Poetics (1 paper)Society (1 paper)Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (1 paper)Religion (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
John Schmalzbauer
16 papers receiving 268 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Health 78
- Communication 72
- Sociology and Political Science 230
- Public Administration 12
- Gender Studies 27
Countries citing papers authored by John Schmalzbauer
This map shows the geographic impact of John Schmalzbauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Schmalzbauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Schmalzbauer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Schmalzbauer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Schmalzbauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Schmalzbauer. The network helps show where John Schmalzbauer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside John Schmalzbauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 113 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 17 | |
| 7 | The Resilience of Religion in American Higher Education | 2018 | 17 |
| 8 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 9 | Campus Ministry: A Statistical Portrait | 2007 | 5 |
| 10 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 0 |
About John Schmalzbauer
John Schmalzbauer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Philosophy and Communication, having authored 17 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (10 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (6 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (4 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper) and Study and Philosophy of Religion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (78 citations), Communication (72 citations), Sociology and Political Science (230 citations), Public Administration (12 citations) and Gender Studies (27 citations). John Schmalzbauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Mark Pedelty, Maureen R. Waller, Michèle Lamont, Daniel Weber, Elaine Howard Ecklund, David Sikkink, Michael O. Emerson, Sally K. Gallagher, Christian Michael Smith and Wendy Cadge. Their work appears in journals such as Sociology of Religion, Poetics, Society, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.