John Sampson

27 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

John Sampson
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 13
  • Emergency Medical Services 43
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 20
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 85
Replace Michael L. Good with:
Michael L. Good United States
David Feinstein United States
Carol Petersen United States
Joseph Hopkins United States
Michele Joseph Ethiopia
Theodora A. Stavroudis United States
Daniela Ghelfi Switzerland
V. Chopra Netherlands
Trent Reed United States
N Ineson United Kingdom
John Sampson relative to Michael L. Good United States Michael L. Good's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Michael L. Good · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Sampson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Sampson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Sampson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Sampson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Sampson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Sampson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Sampson. The network helps show where John Sampson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Sampson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Sampson Line = papers co-authored together John Sampson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195435
2 201930
3 196224
4 201918
5 201416
6 201516
7 201615
8 201512
9 201411
10 201810
11 20128
12 20037
13 20176
14 20176
15 19585
16 20154
17 19574
18 20194
19 20193
20 20212

About John Sampson

John Sampson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medical Services and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health and Surgery (9 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers), Disaster Response and Management (5 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (5 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (13 citations), Emergency Medical Services (43 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (20 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (85 citations). John Sampson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sierra Leone and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles W. Tucker, L. W. Nordheim, Michael A. Rosen, Eric V. Jackson, Rahul Koka, Thaim B. Kamara, Thomas Simopoulos, Sameer Hirji, Vwaire Orhurhu and Jacquelin Peck. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Science and Engineering, Journal of the National Medical Association, Frontiers in Medicine, International Journal for Quality in Health Care and British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact