John Richardson

4.2k citations
163 papers · 2.6k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

John Richardson

119 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

John Richardson
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 338
  • Philosophy 406
  • Surgery 1.2k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 364
  • Music 57
Replace Michael Friedman with:
Michael Friedman United States
Wolfgang Lederer Austria
Deborah Cook Canada
Seth Schwartz United States
John Jacobs United States
Richard E. Wood United States
Andreas Weber Germany
Mark C. Smith United States
William C. Scott United States
T. J. Clark United Kingdom
John Richardson relative to Michael Friedman United States Michael Friedman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28.5×
Michael Friedman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Richardson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Richardson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Richardson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Richardson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Richardson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Richardson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Richardson. The network helps show where John Richardson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Richardson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Richardson Line = papers co-authored together John Richardson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 163 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999236
2 1998220
3 2004159
4 2011146
5 1995134
6 1996109
7 200397
8
Nietzsche's System
199691
9
Post-thoracotomy spirometric lung function: the effect of analgesia. A review.
199983
10 200181
11 199581
12 197661
13 197859
14 197357
15 200156
16 199554
17 201350
18 199650
19 199540
20 199438

About John Richardson

John Richardson is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Philosophy, Surgery, Music and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 163 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (18 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (14 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (12 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (9 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (8 papers), Music History and Culture (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers) and Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (338 citations), Philosophy (406 citations), Surgery (1.2k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (364 citations) and Music (57 citations). John Richardson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include S Sabanathan, Per‐Arne Lönnqvist, S. Cheema, Rajesh Shah, Alan J. Mearns, Paul McGurgan, Zoher Naja, J. G. Jones, G. C. Wood and D W Ilsley. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia, Continuum and Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact