John Pote

552 citations
12 papers · 314 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John Pote

12 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

John Pote
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Insect Science 177
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 192
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 67
  • Environmental Chemistry 45
  • Plant Science 86
Replace J.A. Addison with:
J.A. Addison Canada
Hollie Marshall United Kingdom
Edmond R. Zaborski United States
Katherine Kamminga United States
Sandra A. Moody United Kingdom
Douglas B. Inkley United States
Hugo J. Marrero Argentina
C. Gregoire-Wibo Belgium
Frédéric Chérot Belgium
Stephen D. Cockfield United States
John Pote relative to J.A. Addison Canada J.A. Addison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
J.A. Addison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pote

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pote more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pote

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pote. The network helps show where John Pote may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Pote, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pote Line = papers co-authored together John Pote links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201675
2 201743
3 200637
4 200336
5 201636
6 201621
7 200621
8 201720
9 201915
10 20127
11 20152
12 20161

About John Pote

John Pote is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (5 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (2 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (2 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper) and Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (177 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (192 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (67 citations), Environmental Chemistry (45 citations) and Plant Science (86 citations). John Pote has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Bingru Huang, Anne L. Nielsen, Clarissa R. Mathews, Zhaolong Wang, E.M. Lyons, Michelle DaCosta, Matthew J. Grieshop, Emily C. Ogburn, J. F. Walgenbach and Galen P. Dively. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, Biological Control, Environmental Entomology, Pest Management Science and Ecology and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact