John Percival

1.1k citations
44 papers · 559 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John Percival

42 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

John Percival
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Demography 155
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 15
  • General Health Professions 181
  • Occupational Therapy 24
  • Health 46
Replace Mineko Wada with:
Mineko Wada Canada
Rowena Hill United Kingdom
Marta Gil‐Lacruz Spain
Daryl Martin United Kingdom
Annika Taghizadeh Larsson Sweden
Judith Gullifer Australia
Colleen McGrath Canada
Natalie D. Pope United States
Rachel Dodge United Kingdom
Paula Gardner Canada
John Percival relative to Mineko Wada Canada Mineko Wada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Mineko Wada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Percival

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Percival's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Percival with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Percival more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Percival

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Percival. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Percival. The network helps show where John Percival may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Percival, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Percival Line = papers co-authored together John Percival links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200692
2 200267
3 201445
4 201039
5 200737
6 200528
7 200023
8 201322
9 201621
10 200614
11 201313
12
End-of-life care in nursing and care homes.
201313
13 201412
14 200112
15 199711
16 198011
17 200611
18
Housing and Support Needs of Older People with Visual Impairment - experiences and challenges
200210
19 20179
20 20168

About John Percival

John Percival is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Occupational Therapy, having authored 44 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (8 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers) and Stoma care and complications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (155 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (15 citations), General Health Professions (181 citations), Occupational Therapy (24 citations) and Health (46 citations). John Percival has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Sudan and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Julienne Hanson, Gemma Lasseter, Lesley Wye, Sarah Purdy, Lorna Duncan, Mark Hawley, Malcolm H. Johnson, Simon Brownsell, Katrina Turner and Jenny Donovan. Their work appears in journals such as Greece and Rome, Ageing and Society, Housing Studies, Health Expectations and Journal of research in nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact