John Pearson

55 papers receiving 955 citations

Peers

John Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Computational Mechanics 249
  • Mechanical Engineering 259
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 89
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 34
  • Materials Chemistry 181
Replace Chol-Bum Kweon with:
Chol-Bum Kweon United States
Yuan‐Jen Chang Taiwan
Kyoungwoo Park South Korea
Bing Liu China
Xin Lü China
Ezio Mancaruso Italy
Ejup N. Ganić United States
Wang Bo China
John Pearson relative to Chol-Bum Kweon United States Chol-Bum Kweon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.3×
Chol-Bum Kweon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pearson. The network helps show where John Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pearson Line = papers co-authored together John Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Behavior of Metals Under Impulsive Loads
1965125
2
Explosive Working of Metals
1963117
3 201495
4 198885
5 197452
6 199448
7 200347
8 201245
9 201244
10 199843
11 199440
12 201340
13 201238
14 195820
15
A Fragmentation Model for Cylindrical Warheads
199018
16 201818
17 200616
18 198715
19 199413
20 195211

About John Pearson

John Pearson is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Aerospace Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Railway Engineering and Dynamics (10 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (10 papers), Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control (6 papers), Radiative Heat Transfer Studies (6 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (6 papers), Inertial Sensor and Navigation (5 papers), Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems (4 papers) and Engineering and Test Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (249 citations), Mechanical Engineering (259 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (89 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (34 citations) and Materials Chemistry (181 citations). John Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include John S. Rinehart, R.M. Goodall, Brent W. Webb, Vladimir P. Solovjov, Edwin B. Stear, Daniel Maynes, Roger Dixon, T.X. Mei, Argyrios C. Zolotas and Jian Ma. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Marine Environmental Research, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems and IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact