John O. Larkin
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Surgery top 5%
- Hernia repair and management
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Esophageal and GI Pathology
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Paul McCormick (38 shared papers)Brian Mehigan (39 shared papers)Fiona Wilson (1 shared paper)Jeanne Moriarty (1 shared paper)David Mockler (1 shared paper)Juliette Hussey (1 shared paper)Jonathan Moran (1 shared paper)Emer Guinan (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
John O. Larkin
47 papers receiving 786 citations
John O. Larkin's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 73
- Surgery 574
- Oncology 289
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 166
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 157
Countries citing papers authored by John O. Larkin
This map shows the geographic impact of John O. Larkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John O. Larkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John O. Larkin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John O. Larkin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John O. Larkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John O. Larkin. The network helps show where John O. Larkin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John O. Larkin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The ability of prehabilitation to influence postoperative outcome after intra-abdominal operation: A systematic review and meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 291 |
| 2 | 2015 | 134 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 7 |
About John O. Larkin
John O. Larkin is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Gastroenterology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 800 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (18 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (9 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (6 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (5 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (5 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (73 citations), Surgery (574 citations), Oncology (289 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (166 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (157 citations). John O. Larkin has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul McCormick, Brian Mehigan, Fiona Wilson, Jeanne Moriarty, David Mockler, Juliette Hussey, Jonathan Moran, Emer Guinan, Michael E. Kelly and Noel E. Donlon. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Cancers, Techniques in Coloproctology, BMC Cancer and The American Surgeon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.