John Noto

50 papers receiving 997 citations

John Noto's Hit Papers

An update to the Horizontal Wind Model (HWM): The quiet time thermosphere 2015 · 564 citations
5640+3+7Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

John Noto
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 838
  • Instrumentation 19
  • Geophysics 55
  • Atmospheric Science 48
  • Aerospace Engineering 54
Replace Gregor Steinbrügge with:
Gregor Steinbrügge United States
Tanguy Bertrand United States
G. Magni Italy
D. J. Rudy United States
S. A. Budzien United States
M. D. Smith United States
R. Politi Italy
A. Raponi Italy
James M. Kaufman United States
J. E. Richardson United States
John Noto relative to Gregor Steinbrügge United States Gregor Steinbrügge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32×
Gregor Steinbrügge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Noto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Noto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Noto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Noto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Noto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Noto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Noto. The network helps show where John Noto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Noto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Noto Line = papers co-authored together John Noto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
An update to the Horizontal Wind Model (HWM): The quiet time thermosphere
Hit paper breakdown →
2015564
2 201572
3 201430
4 200525
5 200121
6 201721
7 199319
8 201419
9 199618
10 202417
11 201816
12 201415
13 200014
14 200114
15 201914
16 200013
17 199811
18 200111
19 201411
20 201511

About John Noto

John Noto is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Spectroscopy, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (32 papers), Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (8 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (6 papers), Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (5 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (4 papers) and Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (838 citations), Instrumentation (19 citations), Geophysics (55 citations), Atmospheric Science (48 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (54 citations). John Noto has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan J. Makela, John W. Meriwether, Douglas P. Drob, John T. Emmert, Eelco N. Doornbos, Kate Zawdie, Mark G. Conde, Sarah E. McDonald, Jeffrey H. Klenzing and Gonzalo Hernandez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geophysical Research Letters, Advances in Space Research, Applied Optics and Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact