John Nathan

22 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

John Nathan
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 43
  • Ophthalmology 65
  • Urology 25
  • Epidemiology 121
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 70
Replace Gerard C. de Wit with:
Gerard C. de Wit Netherlands
A. Th. M. van Balen Netherlands
J. González Martín-Moro Spain
G W Cibis United States
S Awaya Japan
Torstein Bertelsen Norway
Katherine A. Lee United States
Klaus-Peter Maag Germany
L Chumbley United States
Monique Leys United States
John Nathan relative to Gerard C. de Wit Netherlands Gerard C. de Wit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Gerard C. de Wit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Nathan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Nathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Nathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Nathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Nathan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Nathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Nathan. The network helps show where John Nathan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Nathan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Nathan Line = papers co-authored together John Nathan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198589
2 201554
3
Effects of retinal image degradation on ocular growth in cats.
198439
4 196437
5
A comparison of ocular development of the Cynomolgus monkey and man
198735
6 196631
7 201725
8 196321
9 198620
10 202214
11 20217
12 20206
13 20205
14 20003
15 20243
16 19893
17 19652
18 19792
19
La vie de Mishima
19801
20 19611

About John Nathan

John Nathan is a scholar working on Surgery, Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Social Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Color Science and Applications (1 paper), Safety Warnings and Signage (1 paper), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (1 paper) and History of Medicine Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (43 citations), Ophthalmology (65 citations), Urology (25 citations), Epidemiology (121 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (70 citations). John Nathan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patricia M Kiely, David P. Crewther, Sheila G. Crewther, B L Cole, Geoffrey H. Henry, Barry L Cole, G. H. Henry, S.G. Crewther, Mildred C. Embree and Michele C. Madigan. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Optometry and Vision Science, Annals of Human Genetics and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact