John Moffat

594 citations
29 papers · 388 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John Moffat

29 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

John Moffat
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Economics and Econometrics 305
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 67
  • Strategy and Management 62
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 23
  • Gender Studies 28
Replace Agnieszka Gehringer with:
Agnieszka Gehringer Germany
Alka Obadić Croatia
Andrew R. Dick United States
Horst Rottmann Germany
Salomé Baslandze United States
Donald J. Boudreaux United States
Jaanika Meriküll Estonia
Stephen T. Easton Canada
Péter Harasztosi Belgium
Jochen Streb Germany
John Moffat relative to Agnieszka Gehringer Germany Agnieszka Gehringer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Agnieszka Gehringer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Moffat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Moffat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Moffat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Moffat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Moffat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Moffat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Moffat. The network helps show where John Moffat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside John Moffat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Moffat Line = papers co-authored together John Moffat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201186
2 201542
3 201624
4 201424
5 201221
6 202019
7 201318
8 201317
9 201216
10 201914
11 201412
12 202112
13 201311
14 20159
15 20199
16 20118
17 20156
18 20195
19 20165
20 20195

About John Moffat

John Moffat is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management, having authored 29 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Development and Policy (8 papers), Global trade and economics (7 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (7 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (7 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (6 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (5 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (4 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (305 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (67 citations), Strategy and Management (62 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (23 citations) and Gender Studies (28 citations). John Moffat has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Harris, Grant Allan, Qian Cher Li, Astrid Krenz, Hong Il Yoo, Catherine Robinson, Ron Martin, Peter Sunley, Emil Evenhuis and Andy Pike. Their work appears in journals such as Regional Studies, Economics Letters, World Economy, Journal of Regional Science and Urban Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact