John McWilliam

36 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

John McWilliam
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Orthodontics 314
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 137
  • Genetics 927
  • Oral Surgery 112
  • Physiology 197
Replace B. C. Leighton with:
B. C. Leighton United Kingdom
Chester S. Handelman United States
Yu‐Fang Liao Taiwan
J Delaire France
Hüsamettin Oktay Türkiye
Guido Galbiati Italy
Ashok Utreja India
Leopoldino Capelozza Filho Brazil
Enrique Solano-Reina Spain
B.D. Tiner United States
John McWilliam relative to B. C. Leighton United Kingdom B. C. Leighton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
B. C. Leighton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John McWilliam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John McWilliam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McWilliam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McWilliam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John McWilliam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McWilliam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McWilliam. The network helps show where John McWilliam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John McWilliam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John McWilliam Line = papers co-authored together John McWilliam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992229
2 1992141
3 1991125
4 1992113
5 1992108
6 199087
7 198985
8 198965
9 198957
10 198754
11 199151
12 199240
13 197836
14 199331
15
Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer retained orthodontic appliances. An in vivo study.
199722
16 199221
17 199318
18 199316
19 199816
20 198315

About John McWilliam

John McWilliam is a scholar working on Genetics, Orthodontics, Oral Surgery, Surgery and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cleft Lip and Palate Research (19 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (16 papers), Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (10 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (9 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (5 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (4 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (314 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (137 citations), Genetics (927 citations), Oral Surgery (112 citations) and Physiology (197 citations). John McWilliam has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Viveca Brattström, Gunvor Semb, S. Linder-Aronson, Kirsten Mølsted, Erik Dahl, William C. Shaw, Birte Prahl‐Andersen, Catherine Asher-Mcdade, Dennis A. Plint and Anders Lundström. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Orthodontics, The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines and European Journal Of Oral Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact