John McManus

3.6k citations
76 papers · 2.5k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

John McManus

73 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

John McManus
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 807
  • Emergency Medicine 849
  • Hematology 436
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 156
  • Emergency Medical Services 148
Replace Steven G Schauer with:
Steven G Schauer United States
Homer Tien Canada
U. Obertacke Germany
L. D. Britt United States
Niels D. Martin United States
David Zideman United Kingdom
Michael D. Pasquale United States
Valerie Shostrom United States
Jarone Lee United States
William T. Zempsky United States
John McManus relative to Steven G Schauer United States Steven G Schauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.9×
Steven G Schauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John McManus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John McManus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McManus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McManus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John McManus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McManus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McManus. The network helps show where John McManus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John McManus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John McManus Line = papers co-authored together John McManus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006451
2 2007208
3 2008107
4 2008104
5 200993
6 201186
7 200783
8 199981
9 200578
10 200970
11 201961
12 200559
13 200558
14 200951
15 200951
16 200850
17 200647
18 200546
19 201242
20 200842

About John McManus

John McManus is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medical Services and Epidemiology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (18 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (17 papers), Disaster Response and Management (11 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (11 papers), Hemostasis and retained surgical items (7 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (5 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (807 citations), Emergency Medicine (849 citations), Hematology (436 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (156 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (148 citations). John McManus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John B. Holcomb, Anthony E. Pusateri, Ian Wedmore, José Salinas, Charles E. Wade, William H. Cooke, Brian J. Eastridge, Melinda J. Morton, Víctor A. Convertino and Caroline A. Rickards. Their work appears in journals such as Prehospital Emergency Care, Academic Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, Annals of Emergency Medicine and Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact