John Marsh

519 citations
5 papers · 259 · 1 hit paper · h-index 2

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
    • Christian Theology and Mission
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Papers in

John Marsh

2 papers receiving 141 citations

John Marsh's Hit Papers

The History of the Synoptic Tradition 1964 · 256 citations
2560+20+41Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

John Marsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Religious studies 207
  • Archeology 88
  • Development 16
  • Classics 13
  • Sociology and Political Science 129
Replace Thomas B. Dozeman with:
Thomas B. Dozeman
Neil Elliott
Julius Wellhausen
Craig R. Koester South Africa
Jouette M. Bassler United States
R. Alan Culpepper United States
Dennis C. Duling United States
Leander E. Keck United States
Bruce W. Longenecker United Kingdom
Charles H. Cosgrove United States
John Marsh relative to Thomas B. Dozeman Thomas B. Dozeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Thomas B. Dozeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Marsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Marsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Marsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Marsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Marsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Marsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Marsh. The network helps show where John Marsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside John Marsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Marsh Line = papers co-authored together John Marsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1
The History of the Synoptic Tradition
Hit paper breakdown →
1964256
2
National War Powers Commission Report
20083
3 20070
4 20020
5
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
20150

About John Marsh

John Marsh is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Religious studies, History and Infectious Diseases, having authored 5 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper), Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper) and American Literature and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (207 citations), Archeology (88 citations), Development (16 citations), Classics (13 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (129 citations). Frequent co-authors include Rudolf Bultmann, Frederick C. Grant, James A. Baker, Brent Scowcroft, Strobe Talbott, Warren Christopher, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Phyllis Adams, Jack Martin and Slade Gorton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, American Literature and Environmental Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact