John Marks

23 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

John Marks
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 72
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 86
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 61
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 73
  • Oncology 68
Replace Sally Fletcher with:
Sally Fletcher United Kingdom
James Haynes United States
Erin M. O’Brien United States
Mohamed Ahmed Egypt
Faisal Rashid Pakistan
Hong Deng China
Hideki Azuma Japan
Se‐Jin Lee South Korea
Svend Borup Jensen Denmark
Paul Williams United States
John Marks relative to Sally Fletcher United Kingdom Sally Fletcher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Sally Fletcher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Marks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Marks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Marks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Marks. The network helps show where John Marks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside John Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Marks Line = papers co-authored together John Marks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198593
2 197284
3 199369
4 198355
5 197847
6 198321
7 198921
8 198813
9 199410
10 19767
11 19886
12 19726
13 20175
14 19765
15 19743
16 19873
17 19963
18 19833
19
The behavioral, cognitive and physiologic effects of long-term methadone and methadyl treatment. 1973 [proceedings].
19762
20 19941

About John Marks

John Marks is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (4 papers), Power Systems and Technologies (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (2 papers), Electricity Theft Detection Techniques (1 paper) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (72 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (86 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (61 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (73 citations) and Oncology (68 citations). John Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. W. Jotham, S. F. A. Kettle, O. Parry, F.K. Okwuasaba, T.J.R. Weakley, Richard G. Finke, Bruce Bernstein, Anthony N. Nicholson, J. N. Lisgarten and Rui W. M. Krause. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, Acta Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications, Neuropsychobiology, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology and Journal of Ethnopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact