John M. Crates
Impact in
-
- Foot and Ankle Surgery
- Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Sports injuries and prevention
- Rehabilitation top 10%
Papers in
-
- Foot and Ankle Surgery 9
- Tendon Structure and Treatment 7
- Sports injuries and prevention 1
- Surgery 8
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 8
- Co-authors
- F. Alan Barber (7 shared papers)A. Paige Whittle (1 shared paper)S. Charlebois (2 shared papers)Richard A. Smith (2 shared papers)Anant Kumar (2 shared papers)A. U. Daniels (1 shared paper)E. Lyle Cain (1 shared paper)E. Greer Richardson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2 papers)Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2 papers)Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (2 papers)Foot & Ankle International (2 papers)The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayNigeria
In The Last Decade
John M. Crates
12 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 151
- Rehabilitation 49
- Surgery 263
- Epidemiology 179
- Health Informatics 2
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Crates
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Crates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Crates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Crates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Crates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Crates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Crates. The network helps show where John M. Crates may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside John M. Crates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 95 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 1 |
About John M. Crates
John M. Crates is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Rehabilitation and General Health Professions, having authored 12 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (9 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (8 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (7 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (3 papers), Nail Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (1 paper), Sports injuries and prevention (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (151 citations), Rehabilitation (49 citations), Surgery (263 citations), Epidemiology (179 citations) and Health Informatics (2 citations). John M. Crates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include F. Alan Barber, A. Paige Whittle, S. Charlebois, Richard A. Smith, Anant Kumar, A. U. Daniels, E. Lyle Cain, E. Greer Richardson, William Weiss and Morley A. Herbert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Foot & Ankle International and The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.