John Leslie

562 citations
54 papers · 290 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John Leslie

45 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

John Leslie
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • History and Philosophy of Science 68
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 151
  • Philosophy 75
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 32
  • Theoretical Computer Science 3
Replace Luke A. Barnes with:
Luke A. Barnes Australia
Kuno Lorenz Germany
Stanley L. Jaki United States
George Gale United States
Alexander Rueger Canada
Brigitte Falkenburg Germany
Richard Dawid Sweden
Cynthia Grant
Milič Čapek United States
Darren Bradley United States
John Leslie relative to Luke A. Barnes Australia Luke A. Barnes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Luke A. Barnes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Leslie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Leslie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Leslie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Leslie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Leslie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Leslie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Leslie. The network helps show where John Leslie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside John Leslie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Leslie Line = papers co-authored together John Leslie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Physical cosmology and philosophy
199050
2
Anthropic Principle, World Ensemble, Design
198220
3 199220
4 198816
5 199014
6
Modern cosmology & philosophy
199811
7 201411
8 199011
9 199310
10 20009
11 20078
12 20167
13 19717
14 19837
15 19976
16 19786
17 19926
18
The Theory That the World Exists Because It Should
19705
19
Book-Review - Universes
19905
20 19915

About John Leslie

John Leslie is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Philosophy, Social Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (14 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (8 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (7 papers), Evolution and Science Education (4 papers), Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (68 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (151 citations), Philosophy (75 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (32 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (3 citations). John Leslie has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Quentin Smith and R. V. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Mind, Philosophy, Philosophia, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and American Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact