John Laver

60 papers receiving 2.4k citations

John Laver's Hit Papers

Principles of Phonetics 1994 · 520 citations
5200+15+30Years since publication250500750

Peers

John Laver
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Linguistics and Language 599
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
  • Language and Linguistics 697
  • Signal Processing 304
  • Artificial Intelligence 890
Replace Sarah Hawkins with:
Sarah Hawkins United Kingdom
Kenneth C. Hill United States
Ian Maddieson United States
Louis-Jean Boë France
Janet Fletcher Australia
Patricia Keating United States
Bodo Winter United Kingdom
Martijn Wieling Netherlands
Victoria A. Fromkin United States
Grace H. Yeni–Komshian United States
John Laver relative to Sarah Hawkins United Kingdom Sarah Hawkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Sarah Hawkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Laver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Laver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Laver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Laver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Laver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Laver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Laver. The network helps show where John Laver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Laver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Laver Line = papers co-authored together John Laver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The phonetic description of voice quality
Hit paper breakdown →
1980832
2
Principles of Phonetics
Hit paper breakdown →
1994520
3 1968212
4 1975192
5 1981127
6 201699
7 196897
8 201488
9 201375
10 201572
11 201561
12 199260
13 201749
14 201743
15 202036
16 197832
17 199330
18 198429
19
The gift of speech
199125
20 198024

About John Laver

John Laver is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Molecular Biology, Signal Processing and Physiology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (18 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (12 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (7 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (6 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (6 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (5 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (599 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations), Language and Linguistics (697 citations), Signal Processing (304 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (890 citations). John Laver has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Donald S. Boomer, Craig A. Smibert, Howard D. Lipshitz, Steven Hiller, J. Timothy Westwood, Quaid Morris, Janet Mackenzie Beck, Xiao Li, Mervyn Jack and Sachdev S. Sidhu. Their work appears in journals such as Speech Communication, Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Journal of Voice, Genome biology and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact