John L. Thomas

1.2k citations
49 papers · 609 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John L. Thomas

34 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers

John L. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • General Psychology 19
  • Marketing 81
  • General Decision Sciences 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 300
  • Political Science and International Relations 137
Replace Kimball Young with:
Kimball Young United States
Frank R. Westie United States
Eugene A. Weinstein United States
Jacqueline Macaulay United States
Robert W. Friedrichs United States
W. J. Rorabaugh United States
Read Bain United States
Richard Wightman Fox United States
Steven Schlossman United States
Elizabeth K. Nottingham United States
John L. Thomas relative to Kimball Young United States Kimball Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Kimball Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John L. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Thomas. The network helps show where John L. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John L. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John L. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together John L. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1951229
2 195157
3 196554
4 196530
5 198327
6 197521
7 196617
8 199616
9
The Liberator: William Lloyd Garrison: a Biography
196316
10 195814
11 196414
12
Slavery Attacked; the Abolitionist Crusade
196512
13 196412
14 198712
15 195112
16 197711
17 19669
18 19576
19 19835
20 19593

About John L. Thomas

John L. Thomas is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Marketing, Religious studies and Cultural Studies, having authored 49 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (12 papers), Race, History, and American Society (6 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers), American History and Culture (4 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (1 paper) and Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (19 citations), Marketing (81 citations), General Decision Sciences (16 citations), Sociology and Political Science (300 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (137 citations). John L. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John H. Rohrer, Muzafer Sherif, James M. McPherson, Henry F. May, Kathryn Kish Sklar, Donald G. Mathews, Gillis J. Harp, Andrew M. Greeley, John T. Noonan and Edmund H. Volkart. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, Reviews in American History, Theological Studies and The New England Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact