John Kramer

53 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

John Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 342
  • Mechanical Engineering 300
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 95
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 193
  • Materials Chemistry 273
Replace E. Mueller with:
E. Mueller Germany
Ayan Roy Chaudhuri India
Peter Oelhafen Switzerland
Kousuke Nakano Japan
M. Mandal India
Masami K. Yamaguchi Japan
R. E. Snyder Canada
A. E. Miller United States
Hiroaki Nishio Japan
Takeshi Hanada Japan
John Kramer relative to E. Mueller Germany E. Mueller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
E. Mueller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Kramer. The network helps show where John Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Kramer Line = papers co-authored together John Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Reflections on impulsivity: An empirical investigation of impulsivity as a construct.
1984121
2 1958102
3 197089
4 200778
5 197872
6 197064
7 200257
8 200957
9 200842
10 200340
11 200540
12 201029
13 200829
14 196529
15 200528
16 199227
17 200324
18 200722
19 197519
20 201419

About John Kramer

John Kramer is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Epidemiology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties and Applications (12 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (11 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (7 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (5 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (5 papers), Glass properties and applications (5 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (5 papers) and Magnetic properties of thin films (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (342 citations), Mechanical Engineering (300 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (95 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (193 citations) and Materials Chemistry (273 citations). John Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Richard Milich, Christoph Tegenkamp, H. Pfnür, Robert F. Mehl, G. M. Pound, Marc A. Schuckit, Victor Hesselbrock, Kathleen K. Bucholz, Tom L. Smith and George P. Danko. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs and Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact