John K. VanDyk
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 1
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 2
- Co-authors
- Erin Doyle (1 shared paper)Daniel Standage (1 shared paper)Adam J. Bogdanove (1 shared paper)Nicholas J. Booher (1 shared paper)Volker Brendel (1 shared paper)Daniel F. Voytas (1 shared paper)G. F. Vance (1 shared paper)Wayne A. Rowley (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nucleic Acids Research (1 paper)Annual Review of Entomology (1 paper)Journal of Forensic Sciences (1 paper)BioScience (1 paper)American Entomologist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceCosta Rica
In The Last Decade
John K. VanDyk
8 papers receiving 556 citations
John K. VanDyk's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Aging 14
- Ecological Modeling 27
- Business and International Management 12
- Molecular Biology 373
- Plant Science 147
Countries citing papers authored by John K. VanDyk
This map shows the geographic impact of John K. VanDyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John K. VanDyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John K. VanDyk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John K. VanDyk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John K. VanDyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John K. VanDyk. The network helps show where John K. VanDyk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside John K. VanDyk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TAL Effector-Nucleotide Targeter (TALE-NT) 2.0: tools for TAL effector design and target prediction Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 471 |
| 2 | 2013 | 53 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 8 | Pro Drupal Development, Second Edition | 2009 | 1 |
| 9 | 1995 | 0 |
About John K. VanDyk
John K. VanDyk is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecological Modeling, Plant Science, Computer Networks and Communications and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers), Date Palm Research Studies (1 paper), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Hemiptera Insect Studies (1 paper), Computational Physics and Python Applications (1 paper), Insect Pest Control Strategies (1 paper) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (14 citations), Ecological Modeling (27 citations), Business and International Management (12 citations), Molecular Biology (373 citations) and Plant Science (147 citations). John K. VanDyk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Erin Doyle, Daniel Standage, Adam J. Bogdanove, Nicholas J. Booher, Volker Brendel, Daniel F. Voytas, G. F. Vance, Wayne A. Rowley, R. D. Stevenson and Gregory W. Courtney. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Annual Review of Entomology, Journal of Forensic Sciences, BioScience and American Entomologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.