John J. Everett

12 papers receiving 855 citations

Peers

John J. Everett
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Rehabilitation 102
  • Human-Computer Interaction 75
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 240
  • Applied Psychology 61
  • Social Psychology 227
Replace Shelley Wiechman with:
Shelley Wiechman United States
Chi‐Wen Chien Australia
Nadja Schott Germany
Rebecca K. Papas United States
Sarah A. Palyo United States
Lynnda M. Dahlquist United States
Zorash Montaño United States
Karen E. Weiss United States
Laurie Snider Canada
Karen Clarke United Kingdom
John J. Everett relative to Shelley Wiechman United States Shelley Wiechman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Shelley Wiechman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Everett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Everett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Everett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Everett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Everett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Everett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Everett. The network helps show where John J. Everett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside John J. Everett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Everett Line = papers co-authored together John J. Everett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1993250
2 2004178
3 1993169
4 199297
5 199285
6
Psychosocial Factors as Predictors of Ballet Injuries: Interactive Effects of Life Stress and Social Support
199839
7 199332
8
Effects of team cohesion and identifiability on social loafing in relay swimming performance.
199229
9 199426
10 19888
11 19932
12 20101

About John J. Everett

John J. Everett is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 916 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Child Therapy and Development (1 paper), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper) and Diversity and Impact of Dance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (102 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (75 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (240 citations), Applied Psychology (61 citations) and Social Psychology (227 citations). John J. Everett has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David R. Patterson, Janet A. Marvin, Ronald E. Smith, Nancy P. Barnett, Charles H. Bombardier, Victoria K. Lee, Kent A. Questad, Frank L. Smoll, G. Leonard Burns and Marcia A. Ciol. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psychological Bulletin, Pain, Sex Roles and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact