John Hofbauer

939 citations
15 papers · 747 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John Hofbauer

14 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers

John Hofbauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Ophthalmology 548
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 580
  • Microbiology 6
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 185
  • Epidemiology 202
Replace James J. Salz with:
James J. Salz United States
Vahid Feiz United States
Patricia E. Bath United States
Jonathan B. Rubenstein United States
Manotosh Ray Singapore
Richard S. Koplin United States
Mark F. Torres United States
J. K. G. Dart United Kingdom
Elvin Yıldız Türkiye
Vera Adobea Essuman Ghana
John Hofbauer relative to James J. Salz United States James J. Salz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James J. Salz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Hofbauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hofbauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hofbauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hofbauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hofbauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hofbauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hofbauer. The network helps show where John Hofbauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Hofbauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Hofbauer Line = papers co-authored together John Hofbauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1993168
2 1994122
3 198174
4
Keratoconus detected by videokeratography in candidates for photorefractive keratectomy.
199567
5 198466
6 198357
7 199253
8 198850
9 198843
10 198722
11 200917
12 20186
13 20071
14 19921
15 20090

About John Hofbauer

John Hofbauer is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 747 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (9 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (1 paper) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (548 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (580 citations), Microbiology (6 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (185 citations) and Epidemiology (202 citations). John Hofbauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Anthony B. Nesburn, Jonathan I. Macy, Ezra Maguen, Thanassis Papaioannou, Michael S. Berlin, James J. Salz, Thomas H. Pettit, Bartly J. Mondino, Kenneth J. Hoffer and Jeremy E. Levenson. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Refractive Surgery, Experimental Eye Research and Cornea.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact