John Hobby

10 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

John Hobby
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Rehabilitation 87
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 171
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 181
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 108
  • Biomedical Engineering 251
Replace Michael W. Keith with:
Michael W. Keith United States
Allen W. Wiegner United States
Gordie Polando United States
James P. Uhlir United States
C Kantor United States
Michael W. Keith United States
Soraya Pérez‐Nombela Spain
Anthony L. Ricamato United States
Fred W. Montague United States
Ronald L. Hart United States
John Hobby relative to Michael W. Keith United States Michael W. Keith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael W. Keith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Hobby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hobby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hobby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hobby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hobby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hobby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hobby. The network helps show where John Hobby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside John Hobby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Hobby Line = papers co-authored together John Hobby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2001258
2 200275
3 200239
4 200136
5 200117
6 200111
7
Pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an implanted dropped foot stimulator (IMPULSE)
20034
8
A novel two-channel implanted drop foot stimulator: initial clinical results
20012
9
Initial results from two trials of an implantable two channel drop foot stimulator
20011
10 20031

About John Hobby

John Hobby is a scholar working on Neurology, Occupational Therapy, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (4 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (2 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper) and Cancer survivorship and care (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (87 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (171 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (181 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (108 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (251 citations). John Hobby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Paul N. Taylor, Mary Jane Mulcahey, Kevin L. Kilgore, Sara Carroll, Allen W. Wiegner, Geoffrey B. Thrope, Vincent Rodney Hentz, Michael W. Keith, Paul Hunter Peckham and Peter Howard Gorman. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) and The Breast.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact