John Hobby
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Papers in
-
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies 7
- Surgery 5
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 4
- Co-authors
- Paul Taylor (6 shared papers)Julie H. Grill (1 shared paper)Allen W. Wiegner (1 shared paper)G.B. Thrope (1 shared paper)Sara Carroll (1 shared paper)Peter H. Gorman (1 shared paper)P. Hunter Peckham (1 shared paper)M.J. Mulcahey (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Spinal Cord (2 papers)British Journal of Occupational Therapy (1 paper)Artificial Organs (1 paper)Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (1 paper)The Breast (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Hobby
10 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Rehabilitation 78
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 149
- Cognitive Neuroscience 148
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 118
- Biomedical Engineering 231
Countries citing papers authored by John Hobby
This map shows the geographic impact of John Hobby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hobby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hobby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Hobby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hobby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hobby. The network helps show where John Hobby may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside John Hobby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 202 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 7 | Pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an implanted dropped foot stimulator (IMPULSE) | 2003 | 5 |
| 8 | A novel two-channel implanted drop foot stimulator: initial clinical results | 2001 | 2 |
| 9 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 10 | Initial results from two trials of an implantable two channel drop foot stimulator | 2001 | 1 |
About John Hobby
John Hobby is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Neurology, Occupational Therapy and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (7 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (4 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (3 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (1 paper) and Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (78 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (149 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (148 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (118 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (231 citations). John Hobby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Taylor, Julie H. Grill, Allen W. Wiegner, G.B. Thrope, Sara Carroll, Peter H. Gorman, P. Hunter Peckham, M.J. Mulcahey, Michael W. Keith and Vincent R. Hentz. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Artificial Organs, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and The Breast.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.