John Hellmann
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
-
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 5
- Race, History, and American Society 2
-
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 6
- Co-authors
- James W. Gibson (1 shared paper)Herbert S. Parmet (1 shared paper)William L. O’Neill (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Literature (5 papers)The American Historical Review (3 papers)American Quarterly (1 paper)Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction (1 paper)American Literary History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
John Hellmann
13 papers receiving 137 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Classics 32
- Literature and Literary Theory 77
- History 70
- Philosophy 58
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 16
Countries citing papers authored by John Hellmann
This map shows the geographic impact of John Hellmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hellmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hellmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Hellmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hellmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hellmann. The network helps show where John Hellmann may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside John Hellmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fables of Fact: The New Journalism as New Fiction | 1981 | 61 |
| 2 | Francis of Assisi, Early Documents | 2002 | 57 |
| 3 | 1987 | 51 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 26 | |
| 5 | Divine and created order in Bonaventure's theology | 2001 | 15 |
| 6 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1979 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 0 |
About John Hellmann
John Hellmann is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Political Science and International Relations and Cultural Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (6 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (5 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (32 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (77 citations), History (70 citations), Philosophy (58 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (16 citations). John Hellmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include James W. Gibson, Herbert S. Parmet and William L. O’Neill. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, The American Historical Review, American Quarterly, Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction and American Literary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.