John Hellmann

741 citations
15 papers · 189 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History
  • History top 5%
    • American Political and Social Dynamics

Papers in

John Hellmann

12 papers receiving 104 citations

Peers

John Hellmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Classics 24
  • History 48
  • Literature and Literary Theory 50
  • Philosophy 39
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 12
Replace Kathleen Ashley with:
Kathleen Ashley United States
Joan DeJean United States
Bruce A. Rosenberg United States
Louis Montrose United States
Dorothea Kehler United States
D. N. DeLuna United Kingdom
Laurie Finke United States
Claude Rawson United Kingdom
David Scott Kastan United Kingdom
Diane Purkiss United Kingdom
John Hellmann relative to Kathleen Ashley United States Kathleen Ashley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Kathleen Ashley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Hellmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hellmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hellmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hellmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hellmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hellmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hellmann. The network helps show where John Hellmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside John Hellmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Hellmann Line = papers co-authored together John Hellmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 198743
2
Francis of Assisi, Early Documents
200240
3
Fables of Fact: The New Journalism as New Fiction
198135
4 199517
5
Divine and created order in Bonaventure's theology
200113
6 199612
7 20008
8 19827
9 19926
10 20015
11 20101
12 19991
13 19901
14 19790
15 19860

About John Hellmann

John Hellmann is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Political Science and International Relations and Cultural Studies, having authored 15 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (5 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (1 paper) and Military History and Strategy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (24 citations), History (48 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (50 citations), Philosophy (39 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (12 citations). John Hellmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include James W. Gibson, Herbert S. Parmet and William L. O’Neill. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction and American Literary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact