John Harding
Impact in
-
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Cancer survivorship and care
- Cancer Risks and Factors
-
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Chris Stevenson (8 shared papers)Indrani Pieris‐Caldwell (2 shared papers)Kun Zhao (1 shared paper)David E. Theile (1 shared paper)Peter A. Brennan (1 shared paper)Kathleen O’Brien (1 shared paper)John S. Horvath (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery (1 paper)Own your potential (DEAKIN) (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
John Harding
10 papers receiving 359 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Oncology 161
- Epidemiology 90
- Health 15
- Family Practice 3
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2
Countries citing papers authored by John Harding
This map shows the geographic impact of John Harding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Harding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Harding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Harding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Harding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Harding. The network helps show where John Harding may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside John Harding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BreastScreen Australia monitoring report 2000–2001 | 2004 | 135 |
| 2 | Cervical screening in Australia 1998–1999 | 2002 | 89 |
| 3 | Cancer survival and prevalence in Australia: cancers diagnosed from 1982 to 2004 | 2008 | 68 |
| 4 | Cancer survival in Australia 1992–1997 : geographic categories and socioeconomic status | 2003 | 26 |
| 5 | Cancer in Australia 1998 | 2001 | 16 |
| 6 | Cervical screening in Australia 2001–2002 | 2004 | 11 |
| 7 | Cervical screening in Australia 2002–2003 | 2005 | 8 |
| 8 | BreastScreen Australia monitoring report 1998–1999 and 1999–2000 | 2003 | 6 |
| 9 | Cervical screening in Australia 2000–2001 and 1999–2000 | 2003 | 5 |
| 10 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 11 | A Concordance to the Works of John Webster | 1978 | 1 |
About John Harding
John Harding is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Dental Education, Practice, Research (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (161 citations), Epidemiology (90 citations), Health (15 citations), Family Practice (3 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (2 citations). John Harding has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Chris Stevenson, Indrani Pieris‐Caldwell, Kun Zhao, David E. Theile, Peter A. Brennan, Kathleen O’Brien and John S. Horvath. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, Own your potential (DEAKIN), Medical Entomology and Zoology and Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.