John Halverson
Impact in
- Archeology top 0.2%
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Anthropology top 2%
- Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Anthropological Studies and Insights
Papers in
-
- Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology 5
- Classical Antiquity Studies 2
-
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition 3
- Multisensory perception and integration 2
- Categorization, perception, and language 2
- Co-authors
- Whitney Davis (3 shared papers)Paul G. Bahn (2 shared papers)Gordon W. Hewes (1 shared paper)Paul Graves (1 shared paper)Dean Falk (1 shared paper)Leo Black (1 shared paper)William Noble (1 shared paper)David Armstrong (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Current Anthropology (5 papers)American Antiquity (1 paper)American Quarterly (1 paper)Hermes (1 paper)New Testament Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Halverson
25 papers receiving 603 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Archeology 341
- Anthropology 370
- Paleontology 217
- Cultural Studies 136
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 130
Countries citing papers authored by John Halverson
This map shows the geographic impact of John Halverson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Halverson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Halverson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Halverson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Halverson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Halverson. The network helps show where John Halverson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Halverson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 327 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 213 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 41 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 35 | |
| 6 | 1976 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1971 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 15 | Social Order in the 'Odyssey' | 1985 | 5 |
| 16 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1969 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1967 | 3 |
About John Halverson
John Halverson is a scholar working on Anthropology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Communication, Classics and Archeology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 841 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (5 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (4 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (4 papers), Medieval Literature and History (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (2 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (341 citations), Anthropology (370 citations), Paleontology (217 citations), Cultural Studies (136 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (130 citations). John Halverson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Whitney Davis, Paul G. Bahn, Gordon W. Hewes, Paul Graves, Dean Falk, Leo Black, William Noble, David Armstrong, William H. Calvin and Iain Davidson. Their work appears in journals such as Current Anthropology, American Antiquity, American Quarterly, Hermes and New Testament Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.