John H. Van Drie

20 papers receiving 781 citations

Peers

John H. Van Drie
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 544
  • Structural Biology 13
  • Molecular Biology 491
  • Pharmacology 105
  • Hepatology 38
Replace Megan L. Peach with:
Megan L. Peach United States
Chunxiao Bi United States
Cole Christie United States
Dimitris Dimitropoulos United States
Bryce K. Allen United States
Gregory B. Quinn United States
Martha Quesada United States
A. Douangamath United Kingdom
Jason B. Cross United States
Konrad Bleicher Switzerland
John H. Van Drie relative to Megan L. Peach United States Megan L. Peach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Megan L. Peach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Van Drie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Van Drie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Van Drie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Van Drie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Van Drie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Van Drie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Van Drie. The network helps show where John H. Van Drie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John H. Van Drie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John H. Van Drie Line = papers co-authored together John H. Van Drie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009135
2 1989117
3 2007117
4 200389
5 200860
6 202059
7 199857
8 200442
9 199732
10 201130
11 200326
12 199720
13 199814
14
Monty Kier and the Origin of the Pharmacophore Concept
200713
15 201211
16 20039
17 20059
18 19967
19 20104
20 19984

About John H. Van Drie

John H. Van Drie is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Organic Chemistry, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 855 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (13 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (7 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (4 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (4 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers) and Enzyme Structure and Function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (544 citations), Structural Biology (13 citations), Molecular Biology (491 citations), Pharmacology (105 citations) and Hepatology (38 citations). John H. Van Drie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Rajarshi Guha, Michael S. Lajiness, David Weininger, Yvonne C. Martin, Liang Tong, Lisa Peltason, Jürgen Bajorath, Mathias J. Wawer, Rebecca Nugent and BioChem Press. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Drug Discovery Today, Drug Discovery Today Technologies and Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact