John Getz

18 papers receiving 688 citations

Peers

John Getz
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Applied Psychology 99
  • Clinical Psychology 289
  • Epidemiology 237
  • General Health Professions 154
  • Social Psychology 120
Replace Renita R. Glaser with:
Renita R. Glaser United States
Katherine N. Wadsworth United States
Robert L. Hubbard United States
Gregor Burkhart Portugal
Kathryn Higgins United Kingdom
Thomas O’Hare United States
L. A. R. Stein United States
Stephen R. Shamblen United States
Nicole R. Morgan United States
Michelle Ifill-Williams United States
John Getz relative to Renita R. Glaser United States Renita R. Glaser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Renita R. Glaser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Getz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Getz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Getz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Getz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Getz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Getz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Getz. The network helps show where John Getz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside John Getz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Getz Line = papers co-authored together John Getz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1994109
2 2002106
3 2003104
4 2001103
5 200376
6 199642
7 200539
8 200236
9 199634
10 200026
11 200126
12 200120
13 199014
14 200710
15 19996
16 19983
17 20161
18 19881
19 20160

About John Getz

John Getz is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 19 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (99 citations), Clinical Psychology (289 citations), Epidemiology (237 citations), General Health Professions (154 citations) and Social Psychology (120 citations). John Getz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include James H. Bray, Gerald J. Adams, Amy McQueen, Paul E. Baer, John A. Webb, Richard I. Evans, Robert S. McKelvey, Scott C. Carvajal, Susan Nash and Anthony Biglan. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Journal of Family Psychology, Sociological Quarterly, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact