John G. Devane

52 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

John G. Devane
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Pharmaceutical Science 327
  • Analytical Chemistry 120
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 133
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 38
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 85
Replace Ermelinda Sakmar with:
Ermelinda Sakmar United States
Keith K. H. Chan United States
Manabu Hanano Japan
Ronald D. Schoenwald United States
Emil E. Samara United States
J. Kuhlmann Germany
DG Waller United Kingdom
Mads Kreilgaard Denmark
Edward J. Randinitis United States
Achiel Van Peer Belgium
John G. Devane relative to Ermelinda Sakmar United States Ermelinda Sakmar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Ermelinda Sakmar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John G. Devane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Devane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Devane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Devane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Devane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Devane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Devane. The network helps show where John G. Devane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John G. Devane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John G. Devane Line = papers co-authored together John G. Devane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994144
2 1998134
3 199081
4 200369
5 198958
6 199951
7 200150
8 200248
9 198445
10 199535
11 202234
12 199930
13 198128
14 199726
15 200019
16 199717
17 199716
18 198316
19 198316
20 199115

About John G. Devane

John G. Devane is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Analytical Chemistry, Statistics and Probability, Pharmacology and Gastroenterology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (13 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (10 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (6 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (5 papers), Magnesium in Health and Disease (4 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (327 citations), Analytical Chemistry (120 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (133 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (38 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (85 citations). John G. Devane has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tom O’Hara, Adrian Dunne, John G. Kelly, Michael P. Ryan, Michael P. Ryan, David Young, James A. Dowell, James L. Leslie, Ajaz S Hussain and Michael J. Fossler. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in experimental medicine and biology, British Journal of Pharmacology, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact