John Frederick Pearson

822 citations
13 papers · 621 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John Frederick Pearson

12 papers receiving 596 citations

Peers

John Frederick Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Applied Psychology 104
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 242
  • Pollution 71
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Ruth Melia with:
Ruth Melia United Kingdom
Leanne Kaye United States
Yuchai Huang China
Scott Delaney United States
Junmin Zhou China
Corey White United States
Taoufik Zoubeidi United Arab Emirates
Olivia Curzio Italy
Shu Xu United States
John Frederick Pearson relative to Ruth Melia United Kingdom Ruth Melia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×22×
Ruth Melia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Frederick Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Frederick Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Frederick Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Frederick Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Frederick Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Frederick Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Frederick Pearson. The network helps show where John Frederick Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Frederick Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Frederick Pearson Line = papers co-authored together John Frederick Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2010266
2 2019150
3 200847
4 201041
5 199931
6 202028
7 201826
8 202214
9 202111
10
Improving infection prevention and control in Ethiopia through supportive supervision of health facilities.
20123
11
Campylobacter Seroreactivity in Adults with Recent Onset of Crohn's Disease
20133
12 20241
13 20200

About John Frederick Pearson

John Frederick Pearson is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Infectious Diseases, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Speech and Hearing, having authored 13 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (1 paper), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (1 paper) and Infection Control in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (104 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (242 citations), Pollution (71 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). John Frederick Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Grenada. Frequent co-authors include John S. Brownstein, Chethan Bachireddy, Allison B. Goldfine, Catherine A. Brownstein, Benjamin I. Bearnot, Jorge Alberto Rodriguez, Adit A. Ginde, Philip Henson, Ashley F. Sullivan and Adam J. Singer. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Academic Emergency Medicine, Diabetes Care, Computers & Education and American Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact