John Frederic Post

473 citations
23 papers · 288 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

John Frederic Post

16 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

John Frederic Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • History and Philosophy of Science 101
  • Philosophy 121
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 92
  • General Psychology 8
  • Theoretical Computer Science 3
Replace Andrew J. Reck with:
Andrew J. Reck United States
Paul Guerrant Morrison United States
Fred Wilson Canada
George N. Schlesinger United States
Rudolph Berlinger
Oswald Hanfling United Kingdom
John Michael Krois Germany
Robert Charles Koons United States
Wiebke Schrader
Ezra Talmor Israel
John Frederic Post relative to Andrew J. Reck United States Andrew J. Reck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Andrew J. Reck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Frederic Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Frederic Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Frederic Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Frederic Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Frederic Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Frederic Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Frederic Post. The network helps show where John Frederic Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside John Frederic Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Frederic Post Line = papers co-authored together John Frederic Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989124
2 199334
3 198830
4 198025
5
Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction
199824
6 19958
7 19847
8 19987
9 19706
10
Is Supervenience Asymmetric
19994
11 20064
12 20004
13 19732
14 20032
15 19842
16 19842
17 19961
18 19791
19 20021
20 19650

About John Frederic Post

John Frederic Post is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper), European and International Law Studies (1 paper), International Law and Human Rights (1 paper) and International Law and Aviation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (101 citations), Philosophy (121 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (92 citations), General Psychology (8 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (3 citations). John Frederic Post has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Clifford Alan Hooker, Richard M. Gale, Keith Campbell, Ruth Garrett Millikan and Derek D. Turner. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Journal of Philosophical Research, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Philosophical Studies and The Southern Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact