John Fox

4.3k citations
98 papers · 3.2k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

John Fox

89 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

John Fox
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Health Informatics 203
  • Health Information Management 433
  • Molecular Medicine 168
  • Management Information Systems 199
  • Artificial Intelligence 648
Replace Jim Warren with:
Jim Warren New Zealand
Tingting Zhu China
Sijia Liu United States
Justin B. Starren United States
Reza Safdari Iran
Theodoros N. Arvanitis United Kingdom
Abel Kho United States
Stanton G. Axline United States
Khader Shameer United States
Sahar S. Alghamdi Saudi Arabia
John Fox relative to Jim Warren New Zealand Jim Warren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Jim Warren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Fox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Fox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Fox. The network helps show where John Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Fox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Fox Line = papers co-authored together John Fox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003457
2 2018394
3 2003237
4 1990170
5 2011140
6 2008124
7 2000120
8 2010106
9 2006101
10 200872
11 198065
12 201262
13 200056
14 202053
15 200353
16 200651
17
Playing with Power: Ballcourts and Political Ritual in Southern Mesoamerica
199650
18
Understanding intelligent agents: analysis and synthesis
200350
19 201448
20 201247

About John Fox

John Fox is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Artificial Intelligence, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and Molecular Biology, having authored 98 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (12 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (11 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (9 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (6 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (6 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (203 citations), Health Information Management (433 citations), Molecular Medicine (168 citations), Management Information Systems (199 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (648 citations). John Fox has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sandeep Reddy, Maulik P. Purohit, DAVID R. SUTTON, Vivek N. Patkar, Paul Leonard Greenhaff, Devra Lee Davis, David G. Hoel, Alan D López, John G. R. Jefferys and Dionisio Acosta. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact