John Eisenhoffer

15 papers receiving 764 citations

Peers

John Eisenhoffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 212
  • Physiology 344
  • Neurology 115
  • Pharmacology 121
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 136
Replace Anders Dejgård with:
Anders Dejgård Denmark
William G. Brose United States
Lionel Dumont Switzerland
Steen Andersen Denmark
Per Skjelbred Norway
L. LaMoreaux United States
Claus Madsen Denmark
Rudolf Duehmke United Kingdom
W. Pipam Austria
Robert van Dongen Netherlands
John Eisenhoffer relative to Anders Dejgård Denmark Anders Dejgård's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Anders Dejgård · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Eisenhoffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Eisenhoffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Eisenhoffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Eisenhoffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Eisenhoffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Eisenhoffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Eisenhoffer. The network helps show where John Eisenhoffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Eisenhoffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Eisenhoffer Line = papers co-authored together John Eisenhoffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2003415
2 201064
3 200854
4 199542
5 201339
6 200739
7 200538
8 200836
9 199326
10 199420
11 199219
12 199018
13 199513
14 20037
15 19921

About John Eisenhoffer

John Eisenhoffer is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Physiology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 831 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphatic System and Diseases (4 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (212 citations), Physiology (344 citations), Neurology (115 citations), Pharmacology (121 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (136 citations). John Eisenhoffer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Dwight E. Moulin, Allan Gordon, J. Watt-Watson, Peter Watson, M. G. Johnston, Zoltan Harsanyi, Andrew C. Darke, Patricia A. Quigley, André Beaulieu and Anju Kagal. Their work appears in journals such as Pain Research and Management, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Microvascular Research, Clinical Therapeutics and Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact