John Eden

5.1k citations
110 papers · 3.9k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

John Eden

105 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

John Eden
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.0k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.4k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.1k
  • Genetics 924
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 827
Replace Rod Baber with:
Rod Baber Australia
William R. Phipps United States
Sylvie Dodin Canada
Anette Tønnes Pedersen Denmark
Bruno Imthurn Switzerland
Maryam Tohidi Iran
Andrzej Milewicz Poland
Walter C. Willett United States
Meir J. Stampfer United States
J.R. Quirós France
John Eden relative to Rod Baber Australia Rod Baber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Rod Baber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Eden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Eden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Eden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Eden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Eden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Eden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Eden. The network helps show where John Eden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Eden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Eden Line = papers co-authored together John Eden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A review of the clinical effects of phytoestrogens.
1996440
2 2013198
3 2003179
4 2007157
5 2003140
6 1999139
7 1995137
8 2003126
9 1995119
10 1995111
11 2007102
12 200096
13 200187
14 198877
15 200666
16 199066
17 200365
18 201262
19 200761
20 200358

About John Eden

John Eden is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 110 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Estrogen and related hormone effects (28 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (24 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (23 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (20 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (17 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (15 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (11 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.0k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.4k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.1k citations), Genetics (924 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (827 citations). John Eden has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David C. Knight, Michael Costello, Barry G. Wren, J. B. Howes, Shayesteh Jahanfar, Abie Ekangaki, Bhushan Shrestha, Neil Philip JOHNSON, Jamshid Alaghband‐Zadeh and Jinzhu Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Climacteric, The Medical Journal of Australia, Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society and Maturitas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact