John E. Wang

439 citations
11 papers · 256 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Wang

9 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

John E. Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 221
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 208
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 77
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 26
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 24
Replace Moisés Bravo‐Gaete with:
Moisés Bravo‐Gaete Chile
Juan Antonio Sáez Spain
Daris Samart Thailand
Joris Raeymaekers Czechia
Koki Nakajima Japan
David Winters Canada
Cheng-Yang Lee China
L. C. T. Guillen Brazil
Steve Shore United States
Clara Murgui United States
John E. Wang relative to Moisés Bravo‐Gaete Chile Moisés Bravo‐Gaete's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Moisés Bravo‐Gaete · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Wang. The network helps show where John E. Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside John E. Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Wang Line = papers co-authored together John E. Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 200395
2 200329
3 201428
4 201027
5 200927
6 200318
7 200417
8 200610
9 20055
10
Spacelike and Time Dependent Branes from DBI
20130
11 20070

About John E. Wang

John E. Wang is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (10 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (5 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (1 paper), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (1 paper), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (1 paper) and Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (221 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (208 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (77 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (26 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (24 citations). John E. Wang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Chiang-Mei Chen, Pei-Ming Ho, Nobuyoshi Ohta, Ishwaree P. Neupane, Koji Hashimoto, Paul J. Rowan, Dejan Stojković and Satoshi Nagaoka. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Psychiatric Services, Physical Review Letters, Classical and Quantum Gravity and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact